Trust and quality
Editorial Policy
Our editorial standard is usefulness before volume. A page should help a student understand an examination, make a study decision or practise a defined skill; it should not exist mainly to hold advertisements.
Last reviewed: 26 July 2026
Sources and original writing
Time-sensitive examination facts should be checked against a primary source such as an examination authority, university, faculty or commission. We write our own explanations and summaries and link to the source used. We do not republish news articles or third-party study notes as our own.
A source link is not an endorsement. Where official pages conflict or a requirement is unclear, the content should say so instead of guessing.
Review and publication
- Draft content is not intended for public indexing or advertising.
- Questions should have a valid answer, useful explanation and appropriate subject scope before approval.
- Guides should identify their source, review date and material limitations.
- Structured data must describe content that is visible on the page.
- Automatically assisted writing or analysis must be checked by a responsible editor before publication.
Updates, corrections and conflicts
Review dates show when a page was last checked, not that an admission rule will remain unchanged. We update material when a new official notice changes a fact or when a student report identifies a supported correction.
Corrections should preserve the reason for the change. Questions reported from a review screen are held for administrative review; a report does not automatically alter the answer.
Advertising boundary
Advertisements are disabled on authentication, account, error, empty-result, draft, test-taking and other transactional screens. Public educational content must remain useful when advertising is removed. Ad eligibility is assessed separately from publication.